

Her response was that she would not have sent us to Hanger so early if she did not think that Isla needed a helmet. She said that Isla was unique in the fact that her head was flat since birth. Because her head grew flat in utero, Dr. Murray was pretty sure from the beginning that Isla would need a helmet to correct it. Therefore she referred us to the specialist at a really young age, believing that the helmet was pretty much inevitable. Her opinion is: if you have the chance to make it better (and insurance is going to pay for it), then why not do it? That is how I've been feeling, but I just needed an "expert" to confirm my thoughts for me.
Here is what her head looks like today...it has changed since the first picture we took two months ago. It looks better to me...a little more uniformly flat across the back and not quite as triangular? Maybe we'll go in next week and her numbers will have improved drastically. If by some chance they do, we will reconsider. But at this point, it is looking like we have officially decided to get the helmet.

I was also curious to see what our pediatrician thought about Isla's head and neck control. I feel like she is behind where she should be in this area. However, the doctor thought she was doing great. She observed Isla sitting up (while supported)and on her tummy, and she thought her head control looked perfect. The one thing Isla didn't want to do was turn her head while on her back, but she never wants to do that. Dr. Murray said the helmet might make it easier for her to turn her head (and consequently learn to roll over). With the helmet and some more physical therapy to make sure she stays on track, she was not concerned one bit about Isla's development. Hearing that was a relief to me!

0 comments:
Post a Comment